navigation
  • A post from A.L. Goldfuss on the BlueSky app that reads: 2023 Gothic You close the blinds to keep out the heat. You tape up the windows to keep out the smoke. In the distance, hurricane sirens.ALT

    2023 Gothic

    You close the blinds to keep out the heat. You tape up the windows to keep out the smoke. In the distance, hurricane sirens.

  • image
    image
  • image
    image
    image
    image
  • image

    Sorry I’m late to the meme but here’s my offering

  • image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image

    If you do not yet know what you feel, why don't we take some time to mull over our relationship?

  • coiour-my-world:
“Lauterbrunnen Valley, Switzerland || mindz.eye
”
  • Lauterbrunnen Valley, Switzerland || mindz.eye

  • image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image

    I do not want to see you cry.

  • Seeing people shoot raptors in other countries is fucking wild to me because we have a whole system of super strict laws governing how you can handle an individual FEATHER off of an eagle, and it doesn't have to even be a dead eagle. One can molt and you can find it on the ground and if you're caught with it the warden will fuck your entire life. What do you mean people are out there shooting them to protect a fucking pheasant. A pheasant??? That thing I have to avoid running over approximately 459 times any time I leave a major highway???

  • image

    My good friend @prismaticate has asked a very good question here, and while I’m not entirely sure I’m qualified to explain it and would love some input from more qualified sources, my SUPER simplified understanding of why the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and its numerous modern revisions and addendums have clauses about this included is this:

    -It’s basically impossible to tell a feather that’s been picked up off the ground from one that’s been taken from a poached bird

    -This used to be a MAJOR problem when bird-feather hats and the like were in high demand back in the day, because several bird species on the edge of extinction kept getting poached in spite of the new laws protecting them since people would just say they “found” any feathers from protected species used in the stuff they were selling, and you couldn’t prove otherwise unless you literally caught them in the act of poaching

    -This eventually got SO bad that they had to just make it illegal to have the feathers at all, with certain exceptions made for members of different indigenous groups, or authorized organizations that display them as part of efforts to educate the public about the species they belong to

    @zooophagous is this a reasonable rundown? Was there anything I missed/any better sources you might recommend to learn more about this? I know it’s probably far more nuanced than that, but this was kind of the explanation I’d always seen floating around. 😅

  • That's pretty much the gist of it! Eagles and eagle feathers have more laws on top of that because of their sacred uses in certain indigenous practices, how they relate to legal falconry, and because eagles at one time were highly endangered while at the same time being a national symbol. Where a cop or a game warden may shrug and look the other way if you, say, illegally picked up a chickadee feather from your bird feeder, if they see a real eagle feather they will notice and will be VERY interested in where it came from.

    Not long ago here someone was arrested and charged for violating these laws because they tried to sell a plains feather bonnet at a pawn shop, claiming they had "found it while exploring an abandoned house."

    The clerk suspected it was real eagle, the warden confirmed it was, and because those feathers are so tightly tracked they were able to locate the family of the previous owners who said the item had been stolen some time ago.

    If nobody knows you have it, obviously you can get away with it. But if they see it, or God forbid you try to SELL it, the hammer will fall.

  • Im surprised every time people think it's a crazy sounding law, it is genuinely one of the only things preventing a lot of native birds from extinction or any asshole could kill as many as they want and just say they found them on the ground

  • Wait, poaching wasn’t about the meat, it was about the feathers?

  • The collapse of bird populations in the USA in the late 1800s thru early 1900s was very much about feathers.

    At its peak the feather trade had feathers that were worth more than gold. Commercial hunters would shoot birds out of the sky and sell feathers by the pound, in literal huge crates. Egrets were especially sought after for their beautiful breeding plumage, which was used in fancy hats and accessories. This wrought havoc on the poor birds because they only ever had this plumage during breeding season, so not only were the breeding birds dying, they were leaving next generation's chicks and eggs behind to die of neglect.

    Beyond hats, the gentleman's art of fly tying was also a popular art form, more for the sake of showing off one's rare collection of feathers and art than for actual fishing.

    There was some meat hunting as well before the banning of commercial hunting, mostly ducks and geese, which also drifted close to extinction as they were taken to be sold in markets.

    Even white tailed deer, the ubiquitous animal that's found all over north America in truly ridiculous numbers, came dangerously low. But meat wasn't where the money was when it came to birds. It was feathers.

    The Lacey act banned commercial hunting in the United States, putting an end to the constant unregulated commercial killing to fill market stalls with meat (which incidentally is why you don't see venison in most supermarkets in the states. Only farmed deer is legally allowed to be sold.)

    And the Migratory Bird Treaty Act made it a crime to not only kill a bird, but to even posess a single feather from one. Most people won't buy a hat that would get them arrested if they wore it outside, so the market for feathers was gutted.

    Even though feather hats aren't popular in this day and age, nobody is in a hurry to amend these laws, as birds in general are well loved and popular animals and still very much threatened by other stressors such as pollution and habitat loss.

  • weeguttersnipe:
“Okay. I can dismiss my worries with wine. And bring on fresh worries. I’ll worry tomorrow.
Eternal Love (Chinese tv series, 2017)
”
    weeguttersnipe:
“Okay. I can dismiss my worries with wine. And bring on fresh worries. I’ll worry tomorrow.
Eternal Love (Chinese tv series, 2017)
”
  • Okay. I can dismiss my worries with wine. And bring on fresh worries. I’ll worry tomorrow.
    Eternal Love (Chinese tv series, 2017)

  • Anonymous
    sent a message

    I was curious how you manage to keep features consistent when you draw them? Do you use models? Is there a model for Crowley? He is very handsome.

  • I don’t use models per se, but I sometimes keep files of photos or art that resembles the subject.

    Crowley is based a bit on the French actor Alain Delon who was once considered the handsomest man in the world. He doesn’t look exactly like Delon, but that is in my head when I draw him. I recall reading Neil and Mr. Pratchett once considered Peter Sellers for Crowley.

    There is no reference for Aziraphale because he is entirely in my head and I can’t really find anyone who looks exactly the way he does. I recall reading that Neil and Mr. Pratchett thought of Brian Dennehy at one point, but my head canon Aziraphale won. I think a Brian Dennehy Aziraphale would have been amazing, though. Anyway, he is actually kind of hard for me to draw because his facial structure is a bit outside my usual style. His face is a bit long and his eyes closer together than I normally do, and if I’m not careful, he slips away. He appears younger and more classically handsome as an angel than he does in his corporeal form, but I think he’s quite fetching as a bookseller.

    Michael Sheen is so perfect in this role it is really hard not to leak bits of his performance into the graphic novel edition, but I have to resist the impulse. I am not allowed to use any of the show actors as models.

    I adore Michael Sheen. Who doesn’t?

    Adam is also a head canon character. He is a perfect young Greek God, so that’s kind of drawing on a day with a Y in it for me.

    The inspiration for Newt I’m keeping a secret. I submitted a number of sketches for Newt. The show Newt dug in deep and I had a hard time shaking him off.

    The Them are based on kids I knew. They’re in my head, I don’t need any photos. They don’t really look like the kinds in the show. The book version of Pepper, for example, is a freckled red-head.

    Anathema is an amalgam of features that don’t come from one person, which I think fits the description of the character. She’s also unusual for me to draw but she’s easier to draw than Aziraphale. I nail her every time.

    Hastur is a caricature of the stereotypical English upper class you’d see in broadsheets 200 years ago. I have a file of pictures of Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 7th Earl of Shaftesbury for Hastur. I considered making Hastur more handsome in a Duke of Hell sort of way, but I think Hastur likes to be scary. I keep thinking of Peter O'Toole when I draw Hastur, too.

    I feel kind of bad basing Hastur on Lord Ashley because he was a wonderful person and I’m sure he didn’t go to Hell.

    Ligur is a broad caricature of Danny Devito. I obviously can’t use a DeVito portrait. That would be wrong. But I can tweak from there and come up with a general idea of the face I want to use.

    Beelzebub and Metatron are head canon, and don’t look a thing like they do in the show. I postulate some demons prefer to look like their angelic selves, and at other times prefer to be fearsome. Crowley can look fearsome when he wants, for example. In the book, Beelzebub appears as a young man in red flames.

    Shadwell was drawn from reference at the direct suggestion of Neil.

    Madame Tracy is based on a certain person, but no one you would have heard of. The original source might not be flattered, but I love Madam Tracy. She’s really easy to draw because she’s a bit over the top. I’m sketching around her scenes right now because I don’t have final approval on some things yet. So she might need some changes later.

    War is head canon, very easy to draw. She’s a knockout. No reference required.

    Famine looks a lot like Famine in the show, actually, but that’s what Famine always looked like, pretty much. Except he has the grey eyes he has in the book.

    Pollution is initially described as being a forgettable white guy, but later described as looking like a romantic poet, which strikes me as being memorable. Because he’s only on one page in his forgettable white guy phase, I chose not to make major changes in his appearance between those panels and later when he appears as his true self, because that’s a bit more confusing than it needs to be in the graphic novel edition. He’s rather glamorous as the essence of Pollution, though. No reference needed.

    Dog is a dog.

    While I do give every detail a lot of thought, I am sure other people have other opinions. I understand that, and hope you enjoy what I do anyway.

    Thanks for your question.

    I’m still a bit under the weather, so may be stepping away from the net for awhile so I can concentrate on work. I have a lot of sick time to make up.

    But don’t think I don’t appreciate your interest in the Good Omens graphic novel adaptation. Your wonderful support is acting on me like a tonic, let me tell you.

  • 1 2 3 4 5
    &. lilac theme by seyche